Q2 of this year’s S(ingapore)MO Senior Round 2 was my proposal (so is Q3 but that one isn’t very interesting), and I just wanted to share a little about the problem development process.


First let me talk about how to draw an accurate diagram. If we let and
be the other 2 intouch points, and
be the midpoint of
(see diagram below), then
, hence
lies on
. We can thus uniquely determine the center
using
- The perpendicular from
to
and
- The perpendicular bisector of
.

Anyways. One day I was looking at a geom solution that involves radius zero circles, and I thought it would be fun to try and construct a problem with the idea.1 For those who are unfamiliar with the technique, you can read this handout.
So what I wanted was a midpoint on a nice collinearity. Why?
If say is the midpoint of
and also lies on line
, then we can find a circle tangent to
at
for which
is the radical axis of this circle and the radius zero circle
. To make the problem work,
has to be a less well-known point so I can conceal it.
With that in mind, I started scrolling through this handout until I saw this config:

In particular, the line . This is true because it is the midline of
, a classic collinearity.
As discussed above, there exists a circle tangent to at
such that
is the radical axis of this circle and
. What exactly is this circle? Currently, I only had one condition: that it was tangent to
at
. So, I needed to find one more point on the circle.

Since is on the radical axis, the power from
to the circle is
, and so
are tangent to the circle. (This is the
in the original question.)
This means the two circles are orthogonal. Hence, if I marked the point where
intersects the incircle,
, and hence
.
But we know many properties of – for example, it passes through the point diametrically opposite
on the incircle, and also passes through the extouch.
If we look at this classic problem, we are motivated to construct the circle through with radius
. So I put all of that in a diagram:

At this point, I had three mutually orthogonal circles. This gave me new ways to define . For example
are collinear and
are also collinear.
I knew there was a proposal somewhere in this diagram already, and I just had to find what i wanted to ask. There were a lot of possible questions, and I tried to find the one that defines the least number of points.
I forgot exactly what I tried here, but I eventually ended up with the following which I was satisfied with:
Let be the incenter of
and
be its incircle. Let
be the intersection of
with
. Suppose
are points on
such that
bisects
and
is tangent to the circumcircle of
. Prove that
and
are also tangent to the circumcircle of
.
While lying in bed, I realised that I could combine all the tangencies into one condition and ask to prove bisects
instead, and that’s how I ended up with the actual question. As a bonus, this version had a zero radius circle solution too.
I passed this question to a bunch of other X-men to testsolve, and the consensus is that it was roughly a easy Q2 level question.
So I submitted it, and to my surprise it really ended up as a Q2.
- If we go back one step further, the reason why I was thinking about constructing geom problems at all is because of the quality of geom problems at SMO last year. ↩︎

Leave a comment