2025 Senior Q2

Q2 of this year’s S(ingapore)MO Senior Round 2 was my proposal (so is Q3 but that one isn’t very interesting), and I just wanted to share a little about the problem development process.

The problem as screenshotted from AoPS
The diagram as screenshotted from GeoGebra

First let me talk about how to draw an accurate diagram. If we let E and F be the other 2 intouch points, and T be the midpoint of EF (see diagram below), then IT\times IA=IE^2=IX^2, hence T lies on (AXY). We can thus uniquely determine the center O using

  • The perpendicular from A to AD and
  • The perpendicular bisector of AT.

Anyways. One day I was looking at a geom solution that involves radius zero circles, and I thought it would be fun to try and construct a problem with the idea.1 For those who are unfamiliar with the technique, you can read this handout.

So what I wanted was a midpoint on a nice collinearity. Why?

If say M is the midpoint of AA' and also lies on line BB', then we can find a circle tangent to AA' at A for which M-B-B' is the radical axis of this circle and the radius zero circle A'. To make the problem work, M has to be a less well-known point so I can conceal it.

With that in mind, I started scrolling through this handout until I saw this config:

In particular, the line N_2 - I - M. This is true because it is the midline of A-D'-X, a classic collinearity.

As discussed above, there exists a circle tangent to AD at A such that IM is the radical axis of this circle and (D). What exactly is this circle? Currently, I only had one condition: that it was tangent to AD at A. So, I needed to find one more point on the circle.

Since I is on the radical axis, the power from I to the circle is ID^2, and so IX,IY are tangent to the circle. (This is the X,Y in the original question.)

This means the two circles are orthogonal. Hence, if I marked the point P where DO intersects the incircle, OA^2=OP\times OD, and hence \angle OPD=90^\circ.

But we know many properties of P – for example, it passes through the point diametrically opposite D on the incircle, and also passes through the extouch.

If we look at this classic problem, we are motivated to construct the circle through M with radius MD. So I put all of that in a diagram:

At this point, I had three mutually orthogonal circles. This gave me new ways to define (AXY). For example X,Y,M are collinear and K',K,I are also collinear.

I knew there was a proposal somewhere in this diagram already, and I just had to find what i wanted to ask. There were a lot of possible questions, and I tried to find the one that defines the least number of points.

I forgot exactly what I tried here, but I eventually ended up with the following which I was satisfied with:

Let I be the incenter of \triangle ABC and \omega be its incircle. Let D be the intersection of \omega with BC. Suppose X,Y are points on \omega such that XY bisects BC and AD is tangent to the circumcircle of \triangle AXY. Prove that IX and IY are also tangent to the circumcircle of \triangle AXY.

While lying in bed, I realised that I could combine all the tangencies into one condition and ask to prove XY bisects BC instead, and that’s how I ended up with the actual question. As a bonus, this version had a zero radius circle solution too.

I passed this question to a bunch of other X-men to testsolve, and the consensus is that it was roughly a easy Q2 level question.

So I submitted it, and to my surprise it really ended up as a Q2.

  1. If we go back one step further, the reason why I was thinking about constructing geom problems at all is because of the quality of geom problems at SMO last year. ↩︎

Comments

Leave a comment